I think this is a first, I have no recollection of ever writing a post about a movie. Indeed, in terms of cinema, my culture does not support any comparison: the 7th art is for me, just as Churchill said of the USSR: a mystery wrapped in an enigma. But let me offer you my interpretation of the latest film from Daniel Grou (Podz said), which deals with a subject very related to my professional life: the harsh reality of educators (and the prospect of a child very badly with him itself).
The first thing that struck me was the hardness of the beginning. Being somewhat shielded, I do not particularly respond to this reality, but it is real and it is a faithful echo of a young abandoned to itself. Throughout the film, silence, weighing the lack of dialogue and the stifling atmosphere of the care we closed permeate a constant unease, a kind of hell for claustrophobic, especially in the head! When you see how young people are ruthless with each other, it goes back to the cruelty of childhood, particularly predominant in youth centers.
The relationship depicted in the film between the educator and the young Tommy, was very believable. Claude Legault is credible in his role, though depicts a rather idyllic portrait of the educator model. Regarding Tommy, it is somewhat inconsistent and sometimes it wins in the dialogues with his father. By cons, at its crisis, it's like on the floor. A tiny scene picked me up with such violence that the entire film: the teacher told Tommy that he has been today and he will have to find him a reward. Immediately, he began to eat with his fingers and he scuttled the success he would live. A reality too horrible to see that note.
I recommend you go see this movie I really enjoyed it. The camera shots are very interesting and a great atmosphere, heavy, intensely emotionally charged. It exudes a little of what we can live in the reality of the intervention and the storyline is compelling.
look forward to hearing your comments!
0 comments:
Post a Comment